Re: [PATCH 05/19] crypto: proc - Fix checkpatch errors

[Richard Hartmann]

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 03:48, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> In this case, please hold seed, tcrypt, wp512 & xcbc. I will
>> refactor them.
>
> OK.

Another workflow question:
Does LKML as a whole prefer rebased patches, patches on top of the
old one or does not one care as long as it's clear what to apply in what
order?
Or does everyone have a different opionion, in which case: What is
yours?


> Thanks for checking.

No need to thank me. You decide what goes in and I accept that.
I signed up to weworking stuff until it suits the relevant maintainer
before I cloned the repo.


Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/