Re: [net-next PATCH v5 3/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers
From: Octavian Purdila
Date: Sat Feb 20 2010 - 08:26:30 EST
On Saturday 20 February 2010 10:20:53 you wrote:
> > +unsigned long *sysctl_local_reserved_ports;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_local_reserved_ports);
> > +
>
> Sorry, this looks somewhat weird, why not just export
> inet_is_reserved_local_port()?
>
My understanding is that if we do that than we won't be able to inline
inet_is_reserved_local_port(). And as David said previously that will have a
significant impact on performance.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/