Re: [PATCH 01/12] Miscellaneous functions and defines needed by AppArmor,including the base path resolution routines.

From: John Johansen
Date: Sat Feb 20 2010 - 12:25:37 EST


John Johansen wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:36:17AM -0800, john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> +static int d_namespace_path(struct path *path, char *buf, int buflen,
>>> + char **name, int flags)
>>> +{
>>> + struct path root, tmp, ns_root = { };
>>> + char *res;
>>> + int deleted, connected;
>>> + int error = 0;
>>> +
>>> + read_lock(&current->fs->lock);
>>> + root = current->fs->root;
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + path_get(&root);
>>> + read_unlock(&current->fs->lock);
>>> +
>>> + spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock);
>>> + if (root.mnt && root.mnt->mnt_ns)
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + ns_root.mnt = mntget(root.mnt->mnt_ns->root);
>>> + if (ns_root.mnt)
>>> + /* released below */
>>> + ns_root.dentry = dget(ns_root.mnt->mnt_root);
>>> + spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
>> Junk. You might as well leave ns_root {NULL, NULL} instead of that crap.
>>
> Right, though the ns_root.mnt and ns_root.dentry are needed below to detect
> disconnected paths.
>
Well no, actually I don't need it. After looking at this again,
If struct path tmp is unmodified we hit our expected root.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/