Re: [net-next PATCH v5 2/3] sysctl: add proc_do_large_bitmap

From: Cong Wang
Date: Sun Feb 21 2010 - 01:31:52 EST


Octavian Purdila wrote:
The new function can be used to read/write large bitmaps via /proc. A
comma separated range format is used for compact output and input
(e.g. 1,3-4,10-10).

Writing into the file will first reset the bitmap then update it
based on the given input.

Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: WANG Cong <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +
kernel/sysctl.c | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
index f66014c..7bb5cb6 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
@@ -980,6 +980,8 @@ extern int proc_doulongvec_minmax(struct ctl_table *, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
extern int proc_doulongvec_ms_jiffies_minmax(struct ctl_table *table, int,
void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
+extern int proc_do_large_bitmap(struct ctl_table *, int,
+ void __user *, size_t *, loff_t *);
/*
* Register a set of sysctl names by calling register_sysctl_table
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index 5259727..ef2c13d 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2635,6 +2635,128 @@ static int proc_do_cad_pid(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
return 0;
}
+/**
+ * proc_do_large_bitmap - read/write from/to a large bitmap
+ * @table: the sysctl table
+ * @write: %TRUE if this is a write to the sysctl file
+ * @buffer: the user buffer
+ * @lenp: the size of the user buffer
+ * @ppos: file position
+ *
+ * The bitmap is stored at table->data and the bitmap length (in bits)
+ * in table->maxlen.
+ *
+ * We use a range comma separated format (e.g. 1,3-4,10-10) so that
+ * large bitmaps may be represented in a compact manner. Writing into
+ * the file will clear the bitmap then update it with the given input.

My test shows it still accepts spaces, e.g.

echo '50000 50003 50005' > ip_local_reserved_ports

works same as

echo '50000,50003,50005' > ip_local_reserved_ports

Is this expected? We will only accept commas, right?


Also, if I write an invalid value, it does reject this, but the previous
value in that file is cleared, shouldn't we keep the previous one?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/