[PATCH v2 10/12] ACPI: processor: refactor internal map_lsapic_id()
From: Alex Chiang
Date: Mon Feb 22 2010 - 14:12:44 EST
Un-nest the if statements for readability.
Remove comments that re-state the obvious.
Change the control flow so that we no longer need a temp variable.
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 20 +++++---------------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 18fa633..ee9bce1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -83,27 +83,17 @@ static int map_lsapic_id(struct acpi_subtable_header *entry,
{
struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *lsapic =
(struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *)entry;
- u32 tmp = (lsapic->id << 8) | lsapic->eid;
- /* Only check enabled APICs*/
if (!(lsapic->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED))
return 0;
- /* Device statement declaration type */
if (device_declaration) {
- if (entry->length < 16)
- printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX
- "Invalid LSAPIC with Device type processor (SAPIC ID %#x)\n",
- tmp);
- else if (lsapic->uid == acpi_id)
- goto found;
- /* Processor statement declaration type */
- } else if (lsapic->processor_id == acpi_id)
- goto found;
+ if ((entry->length < 16) || (lsapic->uid != acpi_id))
+ return 0;
+ } else if (lsapic->processor_id != acpi_id)
+ return 0;
- return 0;
-found:
- *apic_id = tmp;
+ *apic_id = (lsapic->id << 8) | lsapic->eid;
return 1;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/