Re: [PATCH 04/10] ARM: ftrace: allow building without framepointers

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 20:05 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> 
> Btw, you described that mcount is used in some gcc versions and
> __gnu_mcount_nc in newers.
> Shouldn't we have a gcc version dependency here? (not sure we can
> do this from Kconfig though).
> 

Maybe we can add something to recordmcount.pl?

> 
> 
> >  config DEBUG_USER
> >  	bool "Verbose user fault messages"
> >  	help
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c b/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c
> > index 8214bfe..e5e1e53 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.c
> > @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_find_next_bit_be);
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount);
> > +#endif
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__gnu_mcount_nc);
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> > index d412d7c..c98e3a3 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> > @@ -169,6 +169,12 @@ gnu_trace:
> >  	ldmia	sp!, {r0-r3, ip, lr}
> >  	mov	pc, ip
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OLD_MCOUNT
> > +/*
> > + * This is under an ifdef in order to force link-time errors for people trying
> > + * to build with !FRAME_POINTER with a GCC which doesn't use the new-style
> > + * mcount.
> > + */
> >  ENTRY(mcount)
> >  	stmdb	sp!, {r0-r3, lr}
> >  	ldr	r0, =ftrace_trace_function
> > @@ -187,6 +193,7 @@ trace:
> >  	mov	pc, r2
> >  	ldr	lr, [fp, #-4]			@ restore lr
> >  	ldmia	sp!, {r0-r3, pc}
> > +#endif
> >  
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE */
> >  
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > index 6c22d8a..7468ffe 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ if FTRACE
> >  config FUNCTION_TRACER
> >  	bool "Kernel Function Tracer"
> >  	depends on HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > -	select FRAME_POINTER
> > +	select FRAME_POINTER if (!ARM_UNWIND)
> 
> 
> So, if I understand well. If people have ARM_UNWIND but
> FUNCTION_TRACER, it might crash at link time in case
> they don't have a recent enough gcc version to
> support the new -pg style?
> 
> That doesn't look good.
> 
> Ideally, we need HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER to be enabled in arm
> only if (old gcc && frame pointers) || new gcc
> 
> And then, we need config OLD_MCOUNT:
> 	 old gcc && FUNCTION_TRACER
> 
> and config NEW_MCOUNT:
> 	new gcc && FUNCTION_TRACER
> 
> so that we can selectively build mcount or __gnu_mcount_nc.
> 
> Hmm, I fear we can't check gcc version from Kconfig, as I'm
> grepping on Kconfig files...


I would not check gcc version through KCONFIG, but you can have the gcc
version checked and define another macro in a header somewhere, like
asm/ftrace.h. Then we could do something different while it is
compiling.

Disclaimer:
I have to go back and read the entire thread, to know what exactly is
going on ;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/