Re: [Stable-review] [93/93] dm mpath: fix stall when requeueing io
From: Alasdair G Kergon
Date: Tue Feb 23 2010 - 13:14:04 EST
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:16:34PM +0900, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> On 02/22/2010 01:07 AM +0900, Stefan Bader wrote:
> >> @@ -1568,12 +1575,16 @@ static void dm_request_fn(struct request
> >>
> >> blk_start_request(rq);
> >> spin_unlock(q->queue_lock);
> >> - map_request(ti, rq, md);
> >> + if (map_request(ti, rq, md))
> >> + goto requeued;
> >> spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
> >> }
> In the current device-mapper code, I would like to go with
> spin_unlock/lock here.
> However, there was a case to enable irq in map_requst() for request
> allocation, and this spin_lock_irq was a work-around for the case.
> Now, there is no such case in the device-mapper code, so spin_lock should
> be enough here. But I'm still using spin_lock_irq for safeness, since
> there might be some more cases to enable irq during request submission
> to underlying devices.
> I'll remove the _irq in the future after lots of testings.
So, have I understood your reasoning?
- This function (dm_request_fn) is always called with local interrupts disabled.
E.g. from generic_unplug_device() or blk_run_queue().
- The 'map_request()' function was found to re-enable interrupts in one case, but
that case got fixed.
- The code still uses spin_lock_irq to ensure they remain disabled as protection
against there being other cases. This should be changed to spin_lock as a clean-up
but you are not aware of any current breakage.
Alasdair
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/