Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/11] perf, x86: use LBR for PEBS IP+1 fixup

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 22:50 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:

> I think systematically and transparently using LBR to correct PEBS off-by-one
> problem is not such a good idea. You've basically highjacked LBR and user
> cannot use it in a different way.

Well, they could, it just makes scheduling the stuff more interesting.

> There are PEBS+LBR measurements where you care about extracting the LBR data.
> There are PEBS measurements where you don't care about getting the correct IP.
> I don't necessarily want to pay the price, especially when this could
> be done offline in the tool.

There are some people who argue that fixing up that +1 insn issue is
critical, sadly they don't appear to want to argue their case in public.
What we can do is make it optional I guess.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/