Re: [PATCH 2/3] input: use input_mutex instead of BKL when opening input device

From: Dmitry Torokhov
Date: Wed Mar 10 2010 - 01:57:00 EST


On Tuesday 09 March 2010 10:49:20 pm Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. März 2010 07:20:15 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > > I was willing to let the open call go unprotected. But ended up
> > > checking that the three callees were fine (they do not call any of the
> > > other functions that take the mutex).
> > >
> > > Since the fops_put/fops_get do protect that section from the handler
> > > removal and I can't think of any other race right now, I think your
> > > version is really better.
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > OK, applied 2 Thadeu's patches and one Arnd's.
>
> Jiri,
>
> it is possible that this requires a change in usbhid as it uses BKL.
> Do you remember?
>

No, different layer altogether.

--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/