Re: [PATCH] irq: move some interrupt arch_* functions into structirq_chip.

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

On 03/10/2010 09:42 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> All we need between the Xen and the rest of x86 is a convention
> so that we never manage the same irqs.   At least for domU we are
> in an either/or situation so I don't see even that being a problem.
>    

Dom0 too.  This is part of the work implementing what we discussed a 
while back - Xen now completely owns the local and IO apics, so dom0 
only deals with Xen, not the hardware.  Xen has a completely different 
interrupt setup path, but at least it isn't a mishmash of Xen stuff and 
native APIC stuff.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/