Re: [PATCH 4/6] usb-serial: optimize sysrq function calls
From: Jason Wessel
Date: Wed Mar 10 2010 - 17:18:59 EST
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>
>> There is no need to have external function calls for the sysrq
>> functions. The compiler can inline the sysrq calls such that they are
>> entirely a NOP if CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not set.
>>
>
> This is not the best way to do what you want. Keep
> usb_serial_handle_sysrq_char() and usb_serial_handle_break() as
> out-of-line routines in generic.c, but make them conditional on
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ. Then in the header file, depending on whether or
> not CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is defined, either put the usual extern function
> declarations or else put do-nothing inline definitions.
>
> The advantage of keeping the functions out-of-line is the reduced
> amount of code space (since the bodies aren't replicated every place
> they get used). This way you keep that advantage while still getting
> the NOP implementation if CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ isn't set.
>
It is probably fine to just drop this patch entirely then.
I had originally made the change to keep it similar to the uart based
serial drivers where the definitions are inlined.
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/