Re: Memory management woes - order 1 allocation failures

From: Frans Pop
Date: Thu Mar 11 2010 - 22:32:15 EST


On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 10:17:51PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > -#define TTY_BUFFER_PAGE ((PAGE_SIZE - 256) / 2)
> > > +#define TTY_BUFFER_PAGE (((PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct tty_buffer)) /
> > > 2) & ~0xFF)
> >
> > Yes agreed I missed a '-1'
>
> Frans, would you mind testing your NAS box with the following patch
> applied please? It should apply cleanly on top of 2.6.33-rc7. Thanks

Thanks Mel.

I've been running with this patch for about a week now and have so far not
seen any more allocation failures. I've tried doing large rsyncs a few
times.

It's not 100% conclusive, but I would say it improves things and I've
certainly not noticed any issues with the patch.

Before I got the patch I noticed that the default value for
vm.min_free_kbytes was only 1442 for this machine. Isn't that on the low
side? Could that have been a factor?

My concern is that, although fixing bugs in GFP_ATOMIC allocations is
certainly very good, I can't help wondering why the system does not keep a
bit more memory in reserve instead of using everything up for relatively
silly things like cache and buffers.
What if during an rsync I plug in some USB device whose driver has some
valid GFP_ATOMIC allocations? Shouldn't the memory manager allow for such
situations?

Cheers,
FJP

> tty: Keep the default buffering to sub-page units
>
> We allocate during interrupts so while our buffering is normally diced
> up small anyway on some hardware at speed we can pressure the VM
> excessively for page pairs. We don't really need big buffers to be
> linear so don't try so hard.
>
> In order to make this work well we will tidy up excess callers to
> request_room, which cannot itself enforce this break up.
>
> [mel@xxxxxxxxx: Adjust TTY_BUFFER_PAGE to take padding into account]
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

Tested-by: Frans Pop <fjp@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/