Re: [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI

[Florian Mickler]

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:03:06 +0100
florian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Hi all!
> 
> The first patch moves the rfkill sysfs ABI Documentation to Documentation/ABI
> and deprecates the state and claim file. 
> 
> The second patch creates a replacement for the state file. Instead of exporting
> some made-up state we just export the state of the 2 kill lines. 
> 
> The first patch should probably go into 2.6.34, as to warn users 
> (if there are any) early about this removal. 
> If there is no intent to remove the broken files, the feature-removal-schedule hunk 
> should probably be skipped. 
> 
> Cheers,
> Flo
> 
> p.s.: first discussion of this: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/22/127
> 

Hi,

sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's
queued. 

This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and
"hard". 

I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and
blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel
wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it
suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware...

cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/