[patch 035/123] perf_event: Fix preempt warning in perf_clock()

[Greg KH]

2.6.33-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

-----------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 24691ea964cc0123e386b661e03a86a481c6ee79 upstream.

A recent commit introduced a preemption warning for
perf_clock(), use raw_smp_processor_id() to avoid this, it
really doesn't matter which cpu we use here.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <1267198583.22519.684.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/perf_event.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static void perf_unpin_context(struct pe
 
 static inline u64 perf_clock(void)
 {
-	return cpu_clock(smp_processor_id());
+	return cpu_clock(raw_smp_processor_id());
 }
 
 /*


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/