Re: [PATCH 15/18] KVM: MMU: Propagate the right fault back to theguest after gva_to_gpa

[Joerg Roedel]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 04:30:47AM +0000, Daniel K. wrote:
> Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 2883ce8..9f8b02d 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -314,6 +314,19 @@ void kvm_inject_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr,
>>  	kvm_queue_exception_e(vcpu, PF_VECTOR, error_code)
>>  }
>>  +void kvm_propagate_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr, 
>> u32 error_code)
>> +{
>> +	u32 nested, error;
>> +
>> +	nested = error_code &  PFERR_NESTED_MASK;
>> +	error  = error_code & ~PFERR_NESTED_MASK;
>> +
>> +	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !(error_code && PFERR_NESTED_MASK))
>
> This looks incorrect, nested is unused.
>
> At the very least it should be a binary & operation
>
> 	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !(error_code & PFERR_NESTED_MASK))
>
> which can be simplified to
>
> 	if (vcpu->arch.mmu.nested && !nested)
>
> but it seems wrong that the condition is that it is nested and not nested 
> at the same time.

Yes, this is already fixed in my local patch-stack. I found it during
further testing (while fixing another bug). But thanks for your feedback
:-)

	Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/