Re: [PATCH] drm: Allow platform devices to register as DRM devices

[Paul Mundt]

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:56:02AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Allow platform devices without PCI resources to be DRM devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This patch has a bunch of whitespace damage at least in my inbox and
> also in patchwork
> 
> Please also be careful with the places you add copyrights, you moved a
> bunch of code from drm_drv.c to drm_pci.c and added a copyright for
> Code Aurora in drm_pci.c? You can only assert copyright if you actually
> wrote the code, otherwise the patch contains your authorship details
> and who contributed the code. I'm guessing you might have copyright
> over one file in this that being drm_platform.c, the rest I'm less sure
> about.
> 
> I also wonder if we could/should separate the arm drm support out from
> this patch (i.e.  the __arm__ changes).
> 
Also note that pgprot_noncached() is a standard interface these days, so
there is no longer any reason to special case it. There's no reason for
the io prot mapping code turning in to the hell that was the fbmem.c
mmap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/