Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization

[Stephane Eranian]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 16:12 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 15:55 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> >> What's the point of CPU_ONLINE vs. CPU_STARTING if you're saying the
>> >> former is never right? Why not move CPU_ONLINE to the right place and
>> >> drop CPU_STARTING?
>> >
>> > Its right for a lot of things, just not for perf, we need to be ready
>> > and done by the time the cpu starts scheduling.
>> >
>> You mean they need to wait until after the cpu starts scheduling?
>> As opposed to being called just before it starts scheduling.
>
> As in it doesn't really matter for them, and the CPU_ONLINE call is
> convenient in that it allows the callback to schedule too.
>
Fine, I will try your proposed patch tomorrow. A priori, it looks fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/