Re: [PATCH 07/11] Memory compaction core

From: Andrea Arcangeli
Date: Wed Mar 24 2010 - 17:49:00 EST


On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 03:28:54PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:19:24 +0100
> Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > It's a bit strange to test this when we're about to oops anyway. The
> > > > oops will tell us the same thing.
> > >
> > > ...except that we've seen a fair number of null pointer dereference
> > > exploits that have told us something altogether different. Are we
> > > *sure* we don't want to test for null pointers...?
> >
> > Examples? Maybe WARN_ON != oops, but VM_BUG_ON still an oops that is
> > and without serial console it would go lost too. I personally don't
> > see how it's needed.
>
> I don't quite understand the question; are you asking for examples of
> exploits?
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/347006/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/360328/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/342330/
> ...

As far as I can tell, VM_BUG_ON would make _zero_ differences there.

I think you mistaken a VM_BUG_ON for a:

if (could_be_null->something) {
WARN_ON(1);
return -ESOMETHING;
}

adding a VM_BUG_ON(inode->something) would _still_ be as exploitable
as the null pointer deference, because it's a DoS. It's not really a
big deal of an exploit but it _sure_ need fixing.

The whole point is that VM_BUG_ON(!something) before something->else
won't move the needle as far as your null pointer deference exploits
are concerned.

> As to whether this particular test makes sense, I don't know. But the
> idea that we never need to test about-to-be-dereferenced pointers for
> NULL does worry me a bit.

Being worried is good idea, as we don't want DoS bugs ;). It's just
that VM_BUG_ON isn't a solution to the problem (and the really
important thing, it's not improving its detectability either), fixing
the actual bug is the solution.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/