Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (staging/vt66*)

[Forest Bond]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/23/10 22:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20100323:
> 
> 
> 
> (.text+0x5d140): multiple definition of `hostap_set_hostapd'
> (.text+0x5ccab): multiple definition of `hostap_ioctl'
> 
> when
> CONFIG_HOSTAP=y
> and
> CONFIG_VT665[56]=y
> 
> or just both of the latter are =y.

Is there any way to limit CONFIG_VT665[56] to ("n", "m")?  That would be
sufficient as a work-around, right?

Or is it preferable to rename the offending functions?

Thanks,
Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
http://www.pytagsfs.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature