Re: [COUNTERPATCH] mm: avoid overflowing preempt_count() inmmu_take_all_locks()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Apr 01 2010 - 07:16:45 EST
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 14:13 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> If someone is willing to audit all code paths to make sure these locks
> are always taken in schedulable context I agree that's a better fix.
They had better be, they're not irq-safe. Also that's what lockdep is
for.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/