Re: [PATCH] padata: section cleanup

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 00:15:56 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:29:31 -0400
> 
> > Thing is, this isn't net code and it isn't crypto code - it's a
> > kernel-wide utility.
> 
> Thanks goodness, because if we had put a private copy in the
> networking or the crypto code someone would have given us a hard time.
> 
> Wait a second... we're being given a hard time anyways. :-)

Because the target audience for this work weren't informed about it,
and it would have been better if they had been.

> Kidding aside, why didn't anyone show any interest in the patch when
> it was posted to lkml?  You can say it was smoothered together with
> some crypto stuff, but that was absolutely the logical thing to do
> because the follow-on crypto patches showed what the thing was going
> to be used for.

I dunno - these things happen.  The padata patch appears to have been
sent once to netdev as an RFC back in 2008 and didn't get any replies
there either.  Personally I pay less attention to patches which appear
in the middle of some discussion because I assume they're for
discussion purposes and will come back later.

If I'd known this code was coming I would have reviewed it at an
appropriate time.  Probably others are interested also.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/