Re: [PATCH 1/8] USB: composite: allow optional removal of __initand __exit tags

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:39:35PM +0200, MichaÅ Nazarewicz wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 03:41:28PM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> >>The composite framework has been written using __init and __exit tags
> >>to mark init and exit functions as such.  This works with most of the
> >>composite gadgets however some may need to call init/exit functions
> >>during normal operations.  One example is mass storage gadget which
> >>needs to call exit functions.
> >>
> >>This patch allows gadgets to define USB_NO_INIT_SEGMENT or
> >>USB_NO_EXIT_SEGMENT to remove the __init and __exit declarations
> >>from composite framework.
> 
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:28:52 +0200, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >How about we just drop the __init and __exit tags completly and then
> >we don't have to propagate this mess any further?
> 
> Personally, I don't care, ;) so if you think it's better to drop it all
> together I can change it in a future patch.

That would be great.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/