Re: [PATCH 10/11] viafb: rework the I2C support in the VIA framebufferdriver

[Florian Tobias Schandinat]

Florian Tobias Schandinat schrieb:
> Jonathan Corbet schrieb:
> > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 00:40:39 +0200
> > Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Meanwhile, I'm a little unsure now...is there an action item for me
> > with regard to the i2c code?  I've been staring at it since your last
> > note, but I couldn't find any obvious problems.  I do have to say that
> > Harald's rework is far cleaner than what came before...
>
> Well the main question is probably:
> How does it change the behaviour towards the hardware?
> I tend to think that OLPC might not be the only ones who did something 
> weird with it....and we already know that we shouldn't trust the 
> documentation too much.

I was able to narrow this issue down to the fourth bus. So with
if (i == 4)
	continue;
in the bus creation loop I'm able to get a working framebuffer which 
does not have the issues mentioned. Any ideas what should be done now?


Thanks,

Florian Tobias Schandinat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/