Re: [patch] gpio: potential null dereference

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 01:05:15 +0200
Daniel Gl__ckner <dg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 09:25:20PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > Smatch found a potential null dereference in gpio_setup_irq().  The 
> > "pdesc" variable is allocated with idr_find() that can return NULL.  If
> > gpio_setup_irq() is called with 0 as gpio_flags and "pdesc" is null, it
> > would OOPs here.
> 
> idr_find() doesn't allocate, idr_get_new_above() does.
> Assuming idr_find() never fails for an id if idr_get_new_above()
> successfully allocated that id, I don't think we can reach that
> line with pdesc being NULL:
> 
> - There are two gotos leading to free_sd
> - #2 is after a block that allocates pdesc
> - #1 is in an if (!gpio_flags) block
> - We exit early if ((desc->flags & GPIO_TRIGGER_MASK) == gpio_flags)
> - Therefore (desc->flags & GPIO_TRIGGER_MASK) must be != 0 to reach #1
> - Trigger flags are added to desc->flags only after we have
>   successfully allocated pdesc (i.e. right before return 0)
> - We start off with no trigger flags set
> 

heh, thanks.  I figured that something like that might be going on but
couldn't be bothered picking through it all.

That being said, the above sequence of steps is awfully (and unusually)
intricate and is hence hard to preserve and could get broken at some
future time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/