Re: [PATCH 01/10][RFC] tracing: Create class struct for events

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 16:22 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:

> >  #undef DEFINE_EVENT
> >  #define DEFINE_EVENT(template, name, proto, args)	\
> >  	static struct ftrace_event_call			\
> > @@ -430,22 +433,6 @@ perf_trace_disable_##name(struct ftrace_event_call *unused)		\
> >   *
> >   * Override the macros in <trace/trace_events.h> to include the following:
> >   *
> > - * static void ftrace_event_<call>(proto)
> > - * {
> > - *	event_trace_printk(_RET_IP_, "<call>: " <fmt>);
> > - * }
> > - *
> > - * static int ftrace_reg_event_<call>(struct ftrace_event_call *unused)
> > - * {
> > - *	return register_trace_<call>(ftrace_event_<call>);
> > - * }
> > - *
> > - * static void ftrace_unreg_event_<call>(struct ftrace_event_call *unused)
> > - * {
> > - *	unregister_trace_<call>(ftrace_event_<call>);
> > - * }
> > - *
> > - *
> >   * For those macros defined with TRACE_EVENT:
> >   *
> >   * static struct ftrace_event_call event_<call>;
> 
> So.. just wondering, why are you removing these comments ? What's
> replacing them ?
> 
> Maybe you meant to remove this in a following patch ?

 I found a lot of stale comments, these were added with cut and paste
before, and I just removed them here.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/