Re: [PATCH 3/6] hw-breakpoints: Change/Enforce some breakpointspolicies

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri Apr 30 2010 - 21:36:26 EST


On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 06:32:35PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 07:13:56AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > index 675eea7..2d44a2d 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> > @@ -120,25 +120,16 @@ static int get_hbp_len(u16 hbp_len)
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Check for virtual address in user space.
> > - */
> > -int arch_check_va_in_userspace(unsigned long va, u16 hbp_len)
> > -{
> > - unsigned int len;
> > -
> > - len = get_hbp_len(hbp_len);
> > -
> > - return (va <= TASK_SIZE - len);
> > -}
> > -
> > -/*
> > * Check for virtual address in kernel space.
> > */
>
> We were also using the va_in_userspace check for the case of signal
> delivery, so I've just inverted the test for that. Perhaps there's a
> cleaner way to handle it, though.


That looks fine. I wonder if I can assume that such tests, that
are the same between x86 and Sh, can apply to every archs, in which
case I could move that to the generic code.


>
> Other than that, everything seems to work ok. The ksym tracer and ptrace
> tests still pass at least. Feel free to add my Tested/Acked-by on the
> rest if you're respinning it at some point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Great, I'll then merge this fix to the appropriate patch and
add the appropriate tags.

Thanks Paul!



>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> index 4d5e514..89890f6 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ static inline int hw_breakpoint_slots(int type)
> /* arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c */
> extern int arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(struct perf_event *bp);
> extern int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp);
> -extern int arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings(struct perf_event *bp,
> - struct task_struct *tsk);
> extern int hw_breakpoint_exceptions_notify(struct notifier_block *unused,
> unsigned long val, void *data);
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> index 67564e3..efae6ab 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -344,8 +344,7 @@ static int __kprobes hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args)
> perf_bp_event(bp, args->regs);
>
> /* Deliver the signal to userspace */
> - if (arch_check_va_in_userspace(bp->attr.bp_addr,
> - bp->attr.bp_len)) {
> + if (!arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(bp)) {
> siginfo_t info;
>
> info.si_signo = args->signr;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/