Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Take all anon_vma locks in anon_vma_lock

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> This does leave me worrying about concurrent faults poking at
> vma->vm_end without synchronization.

I didn't check this patch in detail yet. I agree it can be removed and
I think it can be safely replaced with the page_table_lock.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/