Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: if6_get_next() fix

[Eric Dumazet]

Le lundi 03 mai 2010 Ã 13:09 -0700, David Miller a Ãcrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 21:46:47 +0200
> 
> > Then, net-next-2.6 doesnt yet have your commit Paul to relax
> > hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(), so its a bit difficult to continue the work.
> 
> Is that in Linus's tree yet?  If it propagates there I can make it
> propagate to net-next-2.6, you just have to tell me you need it.


Hmm, it seems it's already in net-next-2.6, sorry for the confusion.

commit 3120438ad68601f341e61e7cb1323b0e1a6ca367
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Mon Feb 22 17:04:48 2010 -0800

    rcu: Disable lockdep checking in RCU list-traversal primitives
    
    The theory is that use of bare rcu_dereference() is more prone
    to error than use of the RCU list-traversal primitives.
    Therefore, disable lockdep RCU read-side critical-section
    checking in these primitives for the time being.  Once all of
    the rcu_dereference() uses have been dealt with, it may be time
    to re-enable lockdep checking for the RCU list-traversal
    primitives.
    


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/