Re: deadline ALWAYS default for dasd devices(s390) ?

From: Michael Tokarev
Date: Wed May 05 2010 - 03:55:21 EST


05.05.2010 11:52, Stefan Weinhuber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 02:34:16PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
hi,

why is it FORCED ? bypassing a GLOBAL setting and also the kernel
command line !!!

At the time this change was made we had the problem that the
default scheduler chosen by the distributions resulted in
bad performance for DASD devices.
I don't know what options were considered back then, but
I think that having the device driver set a driver specific default
is better than forcing the whole system to use 'our' scheduler.

I agree that hard coding this choice into the driver is not pretty,
but it is pragmatic. Some generic mechanism for setting driver specific
defaults would be nicer, but I doubt that many other drivers would
actually benefit from such an interface.

See also another thread started just two days ago:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/3/404

Just... one more data point... ;)

/mjt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/