Re: [PATCH 3/9 - v2][RFC] tracing: Remove per event traceregistering

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Fri May 07 2010 - 16:03:45 EST


On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 03:08:25PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 20:01 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 10:54:38AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > The second is this extra parameter passed whether or not it is needed.
> > And although we suppose it is safe, I don't feel comfortable with it.
> > So if we can find a more proper way to avoid it, I'm all for it.
>
> Now I'm making the extra parameter mandatory for all tracepoint
> probes. ;-)
>
> But this time, it will be at the start not the end.
>
> void probe(void *data, proto);
>
>
> Unfortunately we can't avoid it. In order to remove the extra code
> (registering and unregistering) and even share the probe among several
> events, we need a way to pass the data to the probe to let the probe
> know what event it is dealing with (to put in the event id into the
> buffer, to let the tracer output code know what event this data is for).
>
> The current method is that only the proto that the tracepoint uses is
> passed to the probe. This gives us no way to add any more information.
>
> This new method allows data to be assigned at probe register, and the
> probe gets this data as the first parameter.
>
> The register_* functions will still do typechecking of the probes, they
> just add the "void *" at the beginning.
>
> Actually, here is a place that I can see where Mathieu's check does come
> in handy. If we add the check test to each probe, and the tracepoint
> proto changes, it will flag it.
>
> Mathieu, you've been explaining this wrong ;-)
>
> I'm not worried about changes to ftrace.h breaking things. I'm worried
> about changes to tracepoint.h breaking ftrace.h. This is where your
> check comes in. As I change the void *data from the end to the start,
> I'm nervous about catching all the probes that are registered this way.
> (ftrace events, syscalls, kprobes, and perf)


Yeah right, I see the point.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/