Re: [PATCH -tip] perf probe: Don't compile CFI related code ifelfutils is old
From: Robert Richter
Date: Mon May 10 2010 - 14:37:14 EST
On 10.05.10 13:28:54, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, May 10, 2010 at 01:12:07PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> > Check elfutils version, and if it is old don't compile
> > CFI analysis code. This allows to compile perf with
> > old elfutils.
>
> _ELFUTILS_PREREQ was introduced in:
>
> commit fbc7245df72ce0142f0a21fa0f4f88c97278bf60
> Author: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue Dec 16 17:03:03 2008 -0800
>
> Which was released in elfutils 0.138, guess this is coverage enough?
> Richard, which version is in your machine?
Right, this does not work, I am using 0.131. As expected,
"_ELFUTILS_PREREQ" is not defined:
gcc -o builtin-probe.o -c -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 -Werror -O6 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wvolatile-register-var -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fstack-protector-all -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Iutil/include -Iarch/x86/include -I/usr/include/elfutils -DDWARF_SUPPORT -DNO_NEWT_SUPPORT -DNO_LIBPERL -DSHA1_HEADER='<openssl/sha.h>' builtin-probe.c
In file included from builtin-probe.c:43:
util/probe-finder.h:47:5: error: "_ELFUTILS_PREREQ" is not defined
util/probe-finder.h:47:21: error: missing binary operator before token "("
make: *** [builtin-probe.o] Error 1
Why not create a compile test as for NO_DWARF in tools/perf/Makefile?
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@xxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/