[087/117] sctp: fix potential reference of a freed pointer
From: Greg KH
Date: Mon May 10 2010 - 18:54:43 EST
2.6.33-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 0c42749cffbb4a06be86c5e5db6c7ebad548781f ]
When sctp attempts to update an assocition, it removes any
addresses that were not in the updated INITs. However, the loop
may attempt to refrence a transport with address after removing it.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/associola.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sctp/associola.c
+++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
@@ -1194,8 +1194,10 @@ void sctp_assoc_update(struct sctp_assoc
/* Remove any peer addresses not present in the new association. */
list_for_each_safe(pos, temp, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list) {
trans = list_entry(pos, struct sctp_transport, transports);
- if (!sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(new, &trans->ipaddr))
- sctp_assoc_del_peer(asoc, &trans->ipaddr);
+ if (!sctp_assoc_lookup_paddr(new, &trans->ipaddr)) {
+ sctp_assoc_rm_peer(asoc, trans);
+ continue;
+ }
if (asoc->state >= SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED)
sctp_transport_reset(trans);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/