[stable-2.6.32 PATCH] ixgbe: backport bug fix for tx panic
From: Jeff Kirsher
Date: Mon May 10 2010 - 20:47:27 EST
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
backporting this commit:
commit fdd3d631cddad20ad9d3e1eb7dbf26825a8a121f
Author: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Feb 3 13:13:10 2010 +0000
ixgbe: Fix return of invalid txq
a developer had complained of getting lots of warnings:
"eth16 selects TX queue 98, but real number of TX queues is 64"
http://www.mail-archive.com/e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg02200.html
As there was no follow up on that bug, I am submitting this
patch assuming that the other return points will not return
invalid txq's, and also that this fixes the bug (not tested).
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Brandon <brandon@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
index 6339d65..a873c5d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
@@ -5241,9 +5241,13 @@ static int ixgbe_maybe_stop_tx(struct net_device *netdev,
static u16 ixgbe_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
+ int txq = smp_processor_id();
- if (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_FDIR_HASH_CAPABLE)
- return smp_processor_id();
+ if (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_FDIR_HASH_CAPABLE) {
+ while (unlikely(txq >= dev->real_num_tx_queues))
+ txq -= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
+ return txq;
+ }
if (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED)
return (skb->vlan_tci & IXGBE_TX_FLAGS_VLAN_PRIO_MASK) >> 13;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/