Re: [PATCH 2/3] power/ds2760_battery: make charge_now andcharge_full writeable

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:38:45PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
[...]
> +static int ds2760_battery_set_property(struct power_supply *psy,
> +				       enum power_supply_property psp,
> +				       const union power_supply_propval *val)
> +{
> +	int ret = -EPERM;
> +	unsigned char tmp;
> +	struct ds2760_device_info *di = to_ds2760_device_info(psy);
> +
> +	switch (psp) {
> +	case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL:
> +		/* the interface counts in uAh, convert the value */
> +		ds2760_battery_write_rated_capacity(di, (val->intval / 1000L) /
> +							RATED_CAPACITY_FACTOR);

OK, Mark hinted that you should not change rated (design)
capacity, ever. You've made CHARGE_FULL writable, which now
actually changes CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN (which reports
rated_capacity). Obviously, this isn't acceptable.

I understand that you might want to change rated capacity for
your custom battery setups, and that's fine. After all, it's
your hardware, and you have a right to break it. :-)

But to do so,

1. Could you at least change this back to
   POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN, so it'll be clear what
   exactly this prop is actually changing, and

2. Can we introduce Kconfig symbol BATTERY_DS2760_UNSAFE_OPS,
   and put an #ifdefs for this property? It should be
   'default n', of course. Plus we can #ifdef the rated_capacity
   module param as well.

Thanks!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/