Re: [trivial PATCH] arch/x86: Remove unnecessary returns from voidfunction()'s

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 05/11/2010 08:51 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 20:37 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Churn is *not* motivated just
>> for "consistency" unless it improves readability.
> 
> Consistency improves readability.

As a general rule, sure.  For any specific instance it is a big "it
depends".

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/