Re: Perf and ftrace [was Re: PyTimechart]

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 18:46 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > But there is no strong reason for perf record not to use splice,
> > a part the fact that perf doesn't support splice.
> > 
> Its mostly an interface/api question. You cannot easily splice() a
> mmap()'ed buffer on machines that have address constraints like sparc.

Ah ? Can you explain this issue a bit more ? There is possibly a concern I don't
quite see here.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> The thing I was thinking about is adding a new syscall that creates a
> single buffer of specified size and provides a fd. Then use
> PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT, to connect an event to that fd/buffer and use
> splice() on that fd.
> 
> It could reuse most of the perf buffer code, but simply not map it into
> userspace and therefore not have the restriction on the vaddr.
> 
> Once you have that, a .splice_read implementation shouldn't be too hard.
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/