Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 23/23] vhost: add __rcu annotations
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Wed May 12 2010 - 17:54:48 EST
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:33:42PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Also add rcu_dreference_protected() for code paths where locks are held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
Maybe long lines can be fixed? Otherwise looks ok.
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 11 ++++++++---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 14 ++++++++------
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 9777583..945c5cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,10 @@ static void vhost_net_disable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> static void vhost_net_enable_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> {
> - struct socket *sock = vq->private_data;
> + struct socket *sock;
> +
> + sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> if (!sock)
> return;
> if (vq == n->vqs + VHOST_NET_VQ_TX) {
> @@ -380,7 +383,8 @@ static struct socket *vhost_net_stop_vq(struct vhost_net *n,
> struct socket *sock;
>
> mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);
> - sock = vq->private_data;
> + sock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq);
> rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, NULL);
> mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
> @@ -518,7 +522,8 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd)
> }
>
> /* start polling new socket */
> - oldsock = vq->private_data;
> + oldsock = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->private_data,
> + lockdep_is_held(&vq->mutex));
> if (sock == oldsock)
> goto done;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index e69d238..fc0c077 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ long vhost_dev_reset_owner(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> vhost_dev_cleanup(dev);
>
> memory->nregions = 0;
> - dev->memory = memory;
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->memory, memory);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -212,8 +212,9 @@ void vhost_dev_cleanup(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> fput(dev->log_file);
> dev->log_file = NULL;
> /* No one will access memory at this point */
> - kfree(dev->memory);
> - dev->memory = NULL;
> + kfree(rcu_dereference_protected(dev->memory,
> + lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)));
> + RCU_INIT_POINTER(dev->memory, NULL);
> if (dev->mm)
> mmput(dev->mm);
> dev->mm = NULL;
> @@ -294,14 +295,14 @@ static int vq_access_ok(unsigned int num,
> /* Caller should have device mutex but not vq mutex */
> int vhost_log_access_ok(struct vhost_dev *dev)
> {
> - return memory_access_ok(dev, dev->memory, 1);
> + return memory_access_ok(dev, rcu_dereference_protected(dev->memory, lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)), 1);
> }
>
> /* Verify access for write logging. */
> /* Caller should have vq mutex and device mutex */
> static int vq_log_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, void __user *log_base)
> {
> - return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, vq->dev->memory,
> + return vq_memory_access_ok(log_base, rcu_dereference_protected(vq->dev->memory, lockdep_is_held(&dev->mutex)),
> vhost_has_feature(vq->dev, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)) &&
> (!vq->log_used || log_access_ok(log_base, vq->log_addr,
> sizeof *vq->used +
> @@ -342,7 +343,8 @@ static long vhost_set_memory(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_memory __user *m)
>
> if (!memory_access_ok(d, newmem, vhost_has_feature(d, VHOST_F_LOG_ALL)))
> return -EFAULT;
> - oldmem = d->memory;
> + oldmem = rcu_dereference_protected(d->memory,
> + lockdep_is_held(&d->mutex));
> rcu_assign_pointer(d->memory, newmem);
> synchronize_rcu();
> kfree(oldmem);
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> index 44591ba..240396c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct vhost_virtqueue {
> * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock() and the end of
> * work item execution acts instead of rcu_read_lock().
> * Writers use virtqueue mutex. */
> - void *private_data;
> + void __rcu *private_data;
> /* Log write descriptors */
> void __user *log_base;
> struct vhost_log log[VHOST_NET_MAX_SG];
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct vhost_dev {
> /* Readers use RCU to access memory table pointer
> * log base pointer and features.
> * Writers use mutex below.*/
> - struct vhost_memory *memory;
> + struct vhost_memory __rcu *memory;
> struct mm_struct *mm;
> struct mutex mutex;
> unsigned acked_features;
> --
> 1.7.0.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/