Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6)
From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Thu May 13 2010 - 17:54:32 EST
* Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [100513 14:36]:
> On Thu, 13 May 2010, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Well this is an interesting problem, and once solved will be handy
> > for all kind of things. My worry is that if it's integrated in it's
> > current form it will be totally out of control all over the place :(
> >
> > Still hoping we can come up with some clean way that avoid the patching
> > all over the place part.. How about the following, can you please check
> > if it would help with your example of guaranteed handling of event:
> >
> > 1. In the kernel, we add one more timer queue for critical timers.
> > The current timer queue(s) stay as it is.
> >
> > 2. We allow selecting the timer based on some flag, the default
> > behaviour being the current default timer queue.
> >
> > 3. Then we add next_timer_interupt_critical() to only query the
> > critical timers along the lines of the current next_timer_interrupt().
> >
> > 4. We implement a custom pm_idle that suspends the system based on
> > some logic and checking if next_timer_interrupt_critical() is
> > empty. If the next_timer_interrupt_critical() does not return
> > anything, we assume it's OK to suspend the system.
> >
> > Now to me it sounds if your the input layer and userspace handle
> > both grab the timers with the critical flags, it should be guaranteed
> > that the events get handled before the system is suspended.
>
> Why do you want this to be tied to timers? Many of the events in
> question are asynchronous with no specific timing relations.
To me it seems that the non-timer related events can be dealt
with toggling the opportunistic suspend idle flag in sysfs.
That should depend on the device and use specific policy.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/