Re: preempt_disable and sleep()
From: ratheesh k
Date: Thu May 13 2010 - 22:46:23 EST
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
<thebigcorporation@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why would you do this?
I was reading some linux kernel journel about preempt_disable() . This
a doubt came to me .
> If you had tried this code, you would have seen the corresponding stack
> dump on the console.
Why it so .? could you explain a little more ? .sleep() will schedule
() , which inturn give back control to kernel .
Thank,
Ratheesh
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
<thebigcorporation@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 00:02 +0530, ratheesh k wrote:
>> I am running RT linux .
>>
>> /* code snippet */
>>
>> preempt_disable()
>> ...........
>> sleep(10);
>> '............
>> preempt_enable()
>>
>>
>> will this sleep() will cause reschedule ?.
>>
>
> Why would you do this?
>
> If you had tried this code, you would have seen the corresponding stack
> dump on the console.
>
>> if an interrupt comes while premption is disabled , how it is handled ?.
>>
>
> Depends on the number of (idle) cores, the setting of CONFIG_PREEMPT_[]
> and the type of interrupt.
>
> RT threaded IRQs would not run until preemption is enabled on a single
> core system.
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Ratheesh
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/