Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf trace: Correctly handle arrays

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 12:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> -- Steve
> 
> > +             else
> > +                     field->elementsize = field->size;
> > +
> >               *fields = field;
> >               fields = &field->next;
> >  
> > @@ -2101,7 +2109,8 @@ static unsigned long long eval_num_arg(void *data, int size,
> >                       }
> >                       right = eval_num_arg(data, size, event, arg->op.right);
> >                       val = read_size(data + larg->field.field->offset +
> > -                                     right * long_size, long_size);
> > +                                     right * larg->field.field->elementsize,
> > +                                     larg->field.field->elementsize);
> >                       break;
> >               }
> >   default_op:
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h
> > index 406d452..cc58a19 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event.h
> > @@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct format_field {
> >       char                    *name;
> >       int                     offset;
> >       int                     size;
> > +     unsigned int            arraylen;
> > +     unsigned int            elementsize;
> >       unsigned long           flags;
> >  };
> >  

What's with this new fad of not trimming emails?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/