Re: [PATCH] ramzswap: Remove backing swap support

[Nitin Gupta]

Hi Minchan,

On 05/16/2010 09:50 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
 
> One thing was about naming.
> Now block device operations has field naming swap_xxx_notify
> (I am not sure exact name). My concern was it's very specific about swap.
> So I thought we would be better to more abstract name.
>
> I thought trim like naming as Linus said.

This call is very swap specific and is quite different from generic trim
stuff. So, I think it will be better not be generalize the name and avoid
confusing it with trim/discard etc.

> 
> Anyway, I will review again at next week if it isn't merged
> linux-next(or linux-mm ?? which is right?). That's because I have a
> interest in your good ramzswap. :)
> 

Thanks, comments/reviews are always welcome :)

Greg: In the meantime, considering 3 Acks, is it possible to pull it in
linux-next?

I can then send additional patches, if you raise any concerns that needs
further code changes.

Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/