Re: [PATCH] x86: unify current 3 similar ways of saving IRQ info

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 17 May 2010, Feng Tang wrote:

>  
> -static void __init assign_to_mp_irq(struct mpc_intsrc *m,

  Why are you removing __init ?

> +static void assign_to_mp_irq(struct mpc_intsrc *m,
>  				    struct mpc_intsrc *mp_irq)
>  {
>  	mp_irq->dstapic = m->dstapic;
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void __init assign_to_mpc_intsrc(struct mpc_intsrc *mp_irq,
>  	m->dstirq = mp_irq->dstirq;
>  }
>  
> -static int __init mp_irq_mpc_intsrc_cmp(struct mpc_intsrc *mp_irq,
> +static int mp_irq_mpc_intsrc_cmp(struct mpc_intsrc *mp_irq,
>  					struct mpc_intsrc *m)

  Ditto

>  {
>  	if (mp_irq->dstapic != m->dstapic)
> @@ -211,7 +211,8 @@ static int __init mp_irq_mpc_intsrc_cmp(struct mpc_intsrc *mp_irq,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static void __init MP_intsrc_info(struct mpc_intsrc *m)
> +/* Will also be called in acpi/sfi related code */
> +void mp_save_irq(struct mpc_intsrc *m)

  Again, this code is called from __init context only and should stay
  __init.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/