[PATCH] KEYS: Return more accurate error codes

[David Howells]

From: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>

We were using the wrong variable here so the error codes weren't being returned
properly.  The original code returns -ENOKEY.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

 security/keys/process_keys.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/keys/process_keys.c b/security/keys/process_keys.c
index 06c2ccf..20a38fe 100644
--- a/security/keys/process_keys.c
+++ b/security/keys/process_keys.c
@@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ try_again:
 
 			ret = install_thread_keyring();
 			if (ret < 0) {
-				key = ERR_PTR(ret);
+				key_ref = ERR_PTR(ret);
 				goto error;
 			}
 			goto reget_creds;
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ try_again:
 
 			ret = install_process_keyring();
 			if (ret < 0) {
-				key = ERR_PTR(ret);
+				key_ref = ERR_PTR(ret);
 				goto error;
 			}
 			goto reget_creds;
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ try_again:
 
 	case KEY_SPEC_GROUP_KEYRING:
 		/* group keyrings are not yet supported */
-		key = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		key_ref = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 		goto error;
 
 	case KEY_SPEC_REQKEY_AUTH_KEY:

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/