Unexpected splice "always copy" behavior observed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Tue May 18 2010 - 11:34:54 EST
Hi,
I'm currently digging into the splice code to figure out why it's always in copy
mode even though I specified the SPLICE_F_MOVE flag and released the page
references from the LTTng ring buffer. I'm splicing to a pipe and then from the
pipe to an ext3 filesystem (2.6.33.4 kernel). I've got the feeling I'm missing
something and I don't like that.
My simple test case is to add a printk around the splice copy:
fs/splice.c: pipe_to_file()
if (buf->page != page) {
/*
* Careful, ->map() uses KM_USER0!
*/
char *src = buf->ops->map(pipe, buf, 1);
char *dst = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER1);
printk(KERN_WARNING "SPLICE COPY!!!\n");
memcpy(dst + offset, src + buf->offset, this_len);
flush_dcache_page(page);
kunmap_atomic(dst, KM_USER1);
buf->ops->unmap(pipe, buf, src);
}
I'll start with a disclaimer that I only recently improved my splice
understanding, so AFAIU:
* pipe_to_file() allocates a struct page *page on its stack.
* It is passed, uninitialized, to
ret = pagecache_write_begin(file, mapping, sd->pos, this_len,
AOP_FLAG_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, &page, &fsdata);
that looks already odd to me, as I would expect pipe_to_file to populate
this page pointer with buf->page initially if the proper conditions are met.
* Looking at the ext2 and ext3 write_begin code, neither are using the pagep
parameter:
ext2:
static int
ext2_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
{
*pagep = NULL;
return __ext2_write_begin(file, mapping, pos, len, flags, pagep,fsdata);
}
ext3:
static int ext3_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags,
struct page **pagep, void **fsdata)
{
struct page *page;
....
retry:
page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, index, flags);
if (!page)
return -ENOMEM;
*pagep = page;
* So, considering the test to check if the page content must be copied:
if (buf->page != page) {
how is it ever possible that buf->page == page ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/