Re: [PATCH 7/8] x86/mrst: add vrtc driver which serves as a wallclock device

[john stultz]

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 11:15 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> 
> There is no particular reason why we need to read it in
> timekeeping_init(). Nothing in the kernel needs the correct wall time
> at that point. So we can safely move the setting of xtime to rtc wall
> clock time to a separate timekeeping_late_init() function.
> 
> John ???

No big objections here. Still would like to keep the amount of time that
the kernel is up without xtime being initialized to a minimum. However
the generic RTC code already have this issue since some of them require
interrupts to be enabled to do a read, so pushing it off into a
_late_init() function is probably just a short term fix until we figure
out how to get the generic RTC code working better with the timekeeping
code.

Does the delayed init required by vrtc cause any trouble with
suspend/resume?

thanks
-john 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/