Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 06/11] perf: core, export pmus via sysfs

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:42 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 09:14:36AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> > Since the CPU and memory controllers are (assumed) symmetric on the
> > system, we get to add things like:
> > 
> > 
> >   /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu_event_source/
> 
> Wouldn't that really be:
> 	/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpu_event_source/
> ?
> 
> /sys/devices/system/cpu is a "type" of devices in the system here, and
> isn't an event source specific to the device itself?
> 
> Or is it for all cpus together?

All CPUs are assumed identical, and the perf syscall has task/cpu
monitor targets. If the CPUs would not be identical (like Paul Mundt
said SH might do) then it would make sense to have different
event_sources for each cpu.

> > I'm not sure where we'd want them to live, we could add them to:
> > 
> >   /sys/kernel/tracepoint_event_source/
> > 
> > and have them live there, but I'm open to alternatives :-)
> 
> Once you go outside of /sys/devices/ you aren't playing with devices
> properly, so you might just want to stick to a "class" and have
> /sys/class/tracepoint_event_source/ where all of the devices would end
> up symlinking to.

Sure, that would work.

> > [ With event_source's being a sysfs-class, we also get a nice flat
> >   collection in /sys/class/event_source/ helping those who get lost
> >   in the device topology, me :-) ]
> 
> Yes, but isn't the fact that you can have different types of
> event sources lend itself to different classes of event sources?

I'm not quite sure adding another abstraction level buys us much.

> >  fd = open("/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu_event_source/instructions/config");
> >  attr->type = fd | PERF_TYPE_FD;
> >  event_fd = perf_event_open(attr, ... );
> >  close(fd);
> > 
> > From that one fd we can find to which 'event_source' it belongs and what
> > particular config we need to use.
> 
> Ah, pass the fd of a sysfs file to sysfs to get the kobject.  Ick,
> that's just, well, something that I never even considered someone would
> need/want to do...

No, we don't pass the fd to sysfs, we pass the fd into a syscall.

> sysfs exports single values just fine.  If you are starting to do more
> complex things, like you currently are, maybe you shouldn't be in
> sysfs...

Well, like said, I'm fine with it actually being single values, its just
that Ingo suggested skipping a few syscalls.

Robert just suggested we could use the sysfs files as device nodes and
have then open() return a perf_event fd. Its just that that would
require we add a ioctl to change the perf_event_attr structure and
attach it to a context.

> I can always knock up a eventfs for you do mount at /sys/kernel/events/
> or something if you want :)

But that won't get us the nice device linkage, right?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/