Re: [PATCH 01/10] perf, trace: Remove IRQ-disable from perf/tracepoint interaction

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> [...]
> @@ -799,13 +799,10 @@ perf_trace_templ_##call(struct ftrace_ev
>  static notrace void perf_trace_##call(proto)				\
>  {									\
>  	struct ftrace_event_call *event_call = &event_##call;		\
> -	struct pt_regs *__regs = &get_cpu_var(perf_trace_regs);		\
> -									\
> -	perf_fetch_caller_regs(__regs, 1);				\
> -									\
> -	perf_trace_templ_##template(event_call, __regs, args);		\
> +	struct pt_regs __regs;						\
>  									\
> -	put_cpu_var(perf_trace_regs);					\
> +	perf_fetch_caller_regs(&__regs, 1);				\
> +	perf_trace_templ_##template(event_call, &__regs, args);		\
>  }
>  [...]

To what extent are you worried about something the size of struct
pt_regs being auto/stack allocated?


- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/