Re: [PATCH 5/6] sctp multistream scheduling: a sample priority queue scheduling module

[Vlad Yasevich]

Yaogong Wang wrote:
> A sample priority queue scheduling module that uses our interface
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yaogong Wang <ywang15@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.32.8/Documentation/dontdiff
> p4/net/sctp/Kconfig p5/net/sctp/Kconfig
> --- p4/net/sctp/Kconfig	2010-05-28 11:48:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ p5/net/sctp/Kconfig	2010-05-28 14:43:17.000000000 -0700
> @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@ menuconfig IP_SCTP
> 
>  if IP_SCTP
> 
> +config SCTP_SCHED_PRIO
> +	tristate "SCTP Multistream Scheduling: Priority Queue"
> +	default m
> +	help
> +	  Use priority queue to schedule among multiple streams
> +
>  config SCTP_DBG_MSG
>  	bool "SCTP: Debug messages"
>  	help
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.32.8/Documentation/dontdiff
> p4/net/sctp/Makefile p5/net/sctp/Makefile
> --- p4/net/sctp/Makefile	2010-05-28 11:48:55.000000000 -0700
> +++ p5/net/sctp/Makefile	2010-05-28 14:48:08.000000000 -0700
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ sctp-y := sm_statetable.o sm_statefuns.o
>  	  tsnmap.o bind_addr.o socket.o primitive.o \
>  	  output.o input.o debug.o ssnmap.o auth.o sched.o
> 
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SCTP_SCHED_PRIO) += sctp_prio.o
>  sctp-$(CONFIG_SCTP_DBG_OBJCNT) += objcnt.o
>  sctp-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
>  sctp-$(CONFIG_SYSCTL) += sysctl.o
> diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.32.8/Documentation/dontdiff
> p4/net/sctp/sctp_prio.c p5/net/sctp/sctp_prio.c
> --- p4/net/sctp/sctp_prio.c	1969-12-31 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
> +++ p5/net/sctp/sctp_prio.c	2010-06-02 13:09:33.000000000 -0700
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/*
> + * Priority queue scheduling among multiple SCTP streams
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <net/sctp/sctp.h>
> +
> +static int zero_high_prio = 1;
> +module_param(zero_high_prio, int, 0644);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(zero_high_prio, "zero indicates highest priority?");
> +
> +static int prio_init(struct sctp_outq *q, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	__u16 i;
> +	q->out_chunk_list = kmalloc(q->asoc->c.sinit_num_ostreams
> +				 * sizeof(struct list_head), gfp);

This could end up wasting quite a lot of space since the queue is initialized
prior to ostreams negotiation.


> +	if (!q->out_chunk_list)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	for (i = 0; i < q->asoc->c.sinit_num_ostreams; i++)
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->out_chunk_list[i]);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void prio_release(struct sctp_outq *q)
> +{
> +	kfree(q->out_chunk_list);
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +static void prio_enqueue_head_data(struct sctp_outq *q,
> +					struct sctp_chunk *ch)
> +{
> +	list_add(&ch->list, &q->out_chunk_list[ch->sinfo.sinfo_stream]);
> +	q->out_qlen += ch->skb->len;
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +static void prio_enqueue_tail_data(struct sctp_outq *q, struct sctp_chunk *ch)
> +{
> +	list_add_tail(&ch->list, &q->out_chunk_list[ch->sinfo.sinfo_stream]);
> +	q->out_qlen += ch->skb->len;
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sctp_chunk *prio_dequeue_data(struct sctp_outq *q)
> +{
> +	struct sctp_chunk *ch = NULL;
> +	__u16 prio = 0, i, cur = 0;
> +	int flag = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < q->asoc->c.sinit_num_ostreams; i++) {
> +		if (!list_empty(&q->out_chunk_list[i]) && (flag == 0
> +			|| (zero_high_prio ? q->asoc->sched_priv[i] < prio
> +			: q->asoc->sched_priv[i] > prio))) {

Can you please simplify this conditional.  Also, the logical operands
typically end the line, not start it.

> +				cur = i;
> +				flag = 1;
> +				prio = q->asoc->sched_priv[i];
> +		}
> +	}
> +

It might be nice to cache the asoc so you don't have to keep dereferencing the
queue.

Also, isn't there a strong starvation possibility if a higher priority queue
gets most of data?

-vlad

> +	if (flag) {
> +		struct list_head *entry = q->out_chunk_list[cur].next;
> +		ch = list_entry(entry, struct sctp_chunk, list);
> +		list_del_init(entry);
> +		q->out_qlen -= ch->skb->len;
> +	}
> +	return ch;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int prio_is_empty(struct sctp_outq *q)
> +{
> +	__u16 i;
> +	for (i = 0; i < q->asoc->c.sinit_num_ostreams; i++)
> +		if (!list_empty(&q->out_chunk_list[i]))
> +			return 0;
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static struct sctp_sched_ops sctp_prio = {
> +	.name			= "prio",
> +	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
> +	.init			= prio_init,
> +	.release		= prio_release,
> +	.enqueue_head_data	= prio_enqueue_head_data,
> +	.enqueue_tail_data	= prio_enqueue_tail_data,
> +	.dequeue_data		= prio_dequeue_data,
> +	.is_empty		= prio_is_empty,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init sctp_prio_register(void)
> +{
> +	return sctp_register_sched(&sctp_prio);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit sctp_prio_unregister(void)
> +{
> +	sctp_unregister_sched(&sctp_prio);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(sctp_prio_register);
> +module_exit(sctp_prio_unregister);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Yaogong Wang");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SCTP Multistream Scheduling: Priority Queue");
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/