Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH resend] um, hweight: Fix UML boot crash

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:46:01AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 06/09/2010 11:04 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Obviously UML cannot stomach callee reg-saving trickery
>>> introduced with d61931d89be506372d01a90d1755f6d0a9fafe2d
>>> (x86: Add optimized popcnt variants) and oopses during boot:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127522065202435&w=2
>>>
>>> Redirect arch_hweight.h include from the x86 portion to the generic
>>> arch_hweight.h which is a fallback to the software hweight routines.
>>>
>>> LKML-Reference: <201005271944.09541.toralf.foerster@xxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> who's going to push this ASAP. I was just (again) 3/4 through a bisect
>> on 2.6.35-rc2. When I finally realized "Hey that patch, I forgot".
>> (My concentration is not what it used to be)
>>
>> Please push this, someone
>
>Peter, are you happy with this?
>Although we still don't know why UML cannot grok it, it does fix a
>regression in post-2.6.34.
>

Usually Andrew should take UML patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/