Re: [PATCH v4] pm_qos: make update_request non blocking

[Florian Mickler]

On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 11:37:12 -0400
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote:


> This still isn't resilient against two successive calls to update.  If
> the second one gets to schedule_work() before the work of the first one
> has finished, you'll corrupt the workqueue.

Sorry, I don't see it. Can you elaborate?

In "run_workqueue(" we do a list_del_init() which resets the
list-pointers of the workitem and only after that reset the
WORK_STRUCT_PENDING member of said structure. 


schedule_work does a queue_work_on which does a test_and_set_bit on
the WORK_STRUCT_PENDING member of the work and only queues the work
via list_add_tail in insert_work afterwards.

Where is my think'o? Or was this fixed while you didn't look?

So what _can_ happen, is that we miss a new notfication while the old
notification is still in the queue. But I don't think this is a problem.

Cheers,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/